fs/super.c: fix race between freeze_super() and thaw_super()
commit 89f39af129382a40d7cd1f6914617282cfeee28e upstream. Change thaw_super() to check frozen != SB_FREEZE_COMPLETE rather than frozen == SB_UNFROZEN, otherwise it can race with freeze_super() which drops sb->s_umount after SB_FREEZE_WRITE to preserve the lock ordering. In this case thaw_super() will wrongly call s_op->unfreeze_fs() before it was actually frozen, and call sb_freeze_unlock() which leads to the unbalanced percpu_up_write(). Unfortunately lockdep can't detect this, so this triggers misc BUG_ON()'s in kernel/rcu/sync.c. Reported-and-tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Willy Tarreau
parent
3c15d16635
commit
b24eac8630
+3
-3
@@ -1327,8 +1327,8 @@ int freeze_super(struct super_block *sb)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This is just for debugging purposes so that fs can warn if it
|
||||
* sees write activity when frozen is set to SB_FREEZE_COMPLETE.
|
||||
* For debugging purposes so that fs can warn if it sees write activity
|
||||
* when frozen is set to SB_FREEZE_COMPLETE, and for thaw_super().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
sb->s_writers.frozen = SB_FREEZE_COMPLETE;
|
||||
up_write(&sb->s_umount);
|
||||
@@ -1347,7 +1347,7 @@ int thaw_super(struct super_block *sb)
|
||||
int error;
|
||||
|
||||
down_write(&sb->s_umount);
|
||||
if (sb->s_writers.frozen == SB_UNFROZEN) {
|
||||
if (sb->s_writers.frozen != SB_FREEZE_COMPLETE) {
|
||||
up_write(&sb->s_umount);
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user